arqocomparison · 01
    Honest comparison

    arqo
    vs Final Draft

    Final Draft is the industry-standard for a reason: it wrote the format that everyone else conforms to. Arqo is the alternative if you want a phone editor, a real free tier, and a tool that respects your work without auto-generating it. Both are honest tools. The right one depends on who you are.

    We’d rather lose the click than lose the trust.

    §8.6.1Where Final Draft is genuinely betterwe lead with this on purpose
    they win
    Industry default for production

    FD is what 95% of agency-repped writers, network notes, and production coordinators expect on the title page. If your script is going to a card-table that prints FDX from FD13, the path of least friction is FD13. Arqo round-trips FDX cleanly, but FD is the file format author and the studio default.

    they win
    Native macOS / Windows polish on the desktop

    FD has decades of polish on Mac and Windows desktop typography. Arqo’s desktop apps are real and native too — but FD is the more mature, more keyboard-deep experience for writers who never leave the desk.

    §8.6.2Where Arqo is the better toolclaims that hold up to a code audit
    arqo wins
    A real phone editor — not a viewer

    Arqo is built phone-first: same Fountain editor on iOS and Android, sub-2s open, offline, three synced views on a 390px viewport. Final Draft Go is a 3-star reader the App Store reviews describe as buggy on edit. Writers travel; FD does not travel well.

    arqo wins
    A free tier that actually opens a script

    Arqo Free opens two scripts with full editor + full export. FD has a 5-day Suite trial; otherwise credit-card-before-cursor. Most writers want to write before they buy.

    arqo wins
    Bring your own key, with a published refusal list

    Iv is opt-in and surfaces three narrow routes (Suggest, Inspire, Scene Surgeon). Bring your own Claude/GPT/Gemini key on Pro for +$2/mo, or bundled on Studio. It does not ship a "generate scene" button — and it never will. FD’s assistive features are minimal; ours are bounded by design.

    §8.6.3Side by side · Arqo vs Final Draftparity rows are intentional · 'them' rows are intentional
    Feature
    Final Draft
    Arqo
    Industry adoption (production)
    industry standard
    growing · FDX round-trip
    them
    macOS native polish
    mature native app
    native Mac app · newer
    them
    Mobile editor (phone)
    FD Go · companion only
    same editor on iOS / Android
    arqo
    Free tier
    5-day trial
    2 scripts · full editor
    arqo
    No-account demo
    no
    yes · zero friction
    arqo
    Real-time multi-cursor collab
    Collaboration via Cloud
    live cursors · named presence
    arqo
    Assistant in the editor
    minimal
    bring-your-own key (+$2 add-on or Studio) · 3 bounded routes
    arqo
    Story framework library
    Beat Board (1)
    12+ frameworks · live beats
    arqo
    FDX round-trip (locked + dual)
    native
    verified · golden tests
    =
    Industry PDF (Courier-12)
    reference impl.
    matches ±2 pages on 90pp
    =
    Coloured-page revisions
    native
    shipped · BLUE→PINK→…→DOUBLE
    =
    Production reports (DOOD etc.)
    full suite
    char / loc / DOOD
    =
    SmartType / advanced tags
    full
    partial
    them
    §8.6.4What Arqo will not donot vague. these are the buttons we won't ship.
    refused
    No "generate the next scene" button

    The single hardest line to hold. Sudowrite, NolanAI, and Saga ship this. We will not. The moment we do, we are a replacement, not an amplifier — and Arqo is built on the opposite stance.

    refused
    No silent uploading of your script for model training

    Your script is yours. On Pro (with the +$2/mo BYOK add-on) or Studio you can plug in your own key so prompts run through that — we don’t keep them for training. FD doesn’t train on your script either, but writers ask, and we answer in writing.

    refused
    No marketing copy about "assistants that learn your voice"

    Voice-tuned style anchors are a real, separate roadmap item (June 2026). Until they ship, we will not run the line. The competitive pressure to overpromise on assistive features is intense; we are choosing to under-claim.

    refused
    No removing the .fdx export to lock you in

    FDX export is in Free, not paywalled to Pro. If Arqo is wrong for you in three months, you leave with your file intact. Vendor lock-in is the oldest screenwriting-software tax; we’re not charging it.

    Full signed list at /no-list.

    Switching from Final Draft?
    The migration is four steps. /switch-from-finaldraft →

    Free tier opens two scripts. No card. Bring your file, see how it lands.

    §8.6.5Common questions
    Is Arqo a Final Draft replacement?+

    For most working writers, yes — the FDX round-trip is verified by golden tests against FD12, and Pro covers production PDF, Beat Board, Character Bible, and real-time collab. For a coordinator on a network show whose pipeline is 100% FD, no — keep FD13 as the production-side tool and use Arqo for mobile / collab / Iv.

    Will my Final Draft formatting survive the import?+

    Locked scene numbers, A-pages, dual dialogue, revision marks, and the title page round-trip cleanly. SmartType categories beyond Characters/Locations are partial — the import preserves what FD13 stores, but the editing UI for advanced SmartType is on the 2026-Q3 roadmap.

    Can I keep using FD alongside Arqo?+

    Yes. FDX is bidirectional. A common pattern: write on Arqo (mobile + Iv), export to FDX for a producer who needs FD13 specifically, edit there, re-import. Both apps respect the file.

    My agent only accepts Final Draft files.+

    Arqo exports FDX as a primary file format. Your agent receives a .fdx that opens in FD13 with locked scene numbers and dual dialogue intact. Same workflow, different writing tool.

    Does Arqo work offline like FD?+

    Yes. The Mac/Windows desktop app and the iPhone/iPad app are fully offline. The web version also keeps working when you lose connection.

    arqotryarqo.com · comparison · 01